Golf ball

ABSTRACT

A golf ball has a core, an inner cover, an outer cover, and dimples, and satisfies the following mathematical formulas. 
         Vw =54+0.01(2.5 A−B+5 Cv)≥58.0
 
       0.08 X   2 −4.25 X +345−20≤D≤0.08 X   2 −4.25 X +345+20
 
     A: a compression of the golf ball 
     B: a hardness difference between a surface and a center of the core 
         Cv: ( Hi×Ti+Ho×To )/( Ti+To ) 
         Cs: ( Hi×Ti+ 2 Ho×To )/( Ti+ 2 To ) 
     D: a total volume of the dimples 
     
       
      
       X:Sw/Vw  
      
     
     Hi: a hardness of the inner cover 
     Ho: a hardness of the outer cover 
     Ti: a thickness of the inner cover 
     To: a thickness of the outer cover 
       Sw: 3000+10(A−B− 1.5 Cs)

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority on and the benefit of PatentApplication No. 2019-201977 filed in JAPAN on Nov. 7, 2019. The entiredisclosures of this Japanese Patent Application are hereby incorporatedby reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to golf balls. Specifically, the presentinvention relates to golf balls having a core, an inner cover, an outercover, and dimples.

Description of the Related Art

A typical golf ball has a core, an inner cover, and an outer cover. Thecore is formed by crosslinking a rubber composition. The core can havetwo or more layers. The inner cover is formed from a resin composition.The outer cover is formed from another resin composition.

The face of a golf club has a loft angle. When a golf ball is hit withthe golf club, the golf ball is launched at a launch angle correspondingto the loft angle. Furthermore, in the golf ball, backspin due to theloft angle occurs. The golf ball flies with the backspin.

Golf balls have a large number of dimples on the surfaces thereof. Thedimples disturb the air flow around the golf ball during flight to causeturbulent flow separation. This phenomenon is referred to as“turbulization”. Due to turbulization, separation points of the air fromthe golf ball shift backwards leading to a reduction of drag. Theturbulization promotes the displacement between the separation point onthe upper side and the separation point on the lower side of the golfball, which results from the backspin, thereby enhancing the lift forcethat acts upon the golf ball. The reduction of drag and the enhancementof lift force are referred to as a “dimple effect”. Excellent dimplesefficiently disturb the air flow. Excellent dimples produce a largeflight distance. There have been various proposals for dimples.

The greatest interest to golf players concerning golf balls is flightdistance. Golf players particularly place importance on flight distancesupon shots with drivers. Golf balls with which a large flight distanceis achieved upon a shot with a driver can contribute to a good score.

A flight distance depends on the initial speed of the golf ball. Theinitial speed depends on a resilience coefficient. A golf ball that hasa high resilience coefficient when being hit with a driver isadvantageous in terms of flight distance.

An appropriate trajectory height is required in order to achieve a largeflight distance. A trajectory height depends on a spin rate. With a golfball that has a high spin rate, a large trajectory height is achieved.

Various improvements have been proposed regarding the structures,materials, dimple patterns, etc., of golf balls for the purpose ofimproving flight performance. An example of the improvements isdisclosed in JP2004-49270.

An excessive spin rate causes loss of kinetic energy. Therefore, asufficient flight distance cannot be achieved with a golf ball in whichthe trajectory height greatly depends on the spin rate.

On the other hand, with a golf ball having an excessively low spin rate,the lift force is insufficient. With this golf ball as well, asufficient flight distance cannot be achieved.

An object of the present invention is to provide a golf ball that flieson an appropriate trajectory and therefore achieves a large flightdistance.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A golf ball according to the present invention includes a core, an innercover positioned outside the core, and an outer cover positioned outsidethe inner cover. The golf ball further has a plurality of dimples on asurface thereof. The golf ball satisfies the following mathematicalformulas (I) and (II).

Vw=54+0.01(2.5A−B+5Cv)≥58.0   (I)

0.08X ²−4.25X+345−20≤D≤0.08X ²−4.25X+345+20   (II)

A: a compression (Atti) of the golf ball

B: a hardness difference (Shore C) between a surface and a center of thecore

Cv: (Hi×Ti+Ho×To)/(Ti+To)

Cs: (Hi×Ti+2Ho×To)/(Ti+2To)

D: a dimple total volume (mm³)

X: Sw/Vw

Hi: a hardness (Shore D) of the inner cover

Ho: a hardness (Shore D) of the outer cover

Ti: a thickness (mm) of the inner cover

To: a thickness (mm) of the outer cover

Sw: 3000+10(A−B−1.5Cs)

In the golf ball according to the present invention, the balance betweenthe hardness distribution of the core, the hardness and the thickness ofthe cover, and the compression of the golf ball is appropriate. When thegolf ball is hit with a driver, the golf ball is launched at a high ballspeed with an appropriate spin rate. Furthermore, with the golf ball, adimple effect that matches the spin rate is exhibited. The trajectory ofthe golf ball is appropriate. Upon a shot of the golf ball with adriver, a large flight distance can be achieved.

Preferably, the golf ball further satisfies the following mathematicalformula (III).

Sa=4500+10(A−0.5B−2Cs)≥4000   (III)

Preferably, in the golf ball, a lift force coefficient CL satisfies thefollowing mathematical formula (IV)

CLL≤CL≤CLU

CLU: Sw/60×(−9.5×10⁻⁶×D+6.1×10⁻³)+(1.871×10⁻⁴×D−3.5×10⁻³)

CLL: Sw/60×(−3.8×10⁻⁶×D+3.0×10⁻³)+(4.52×10⁻⁵×D+8.32×10⁻²)   (IV)

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a golf ball according toan embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged front view of the golf ball in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a plan view of the golf ball in FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a partially enlarged cross-sectional view of the golf ball inFIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a front view of a golf ball according to another embodiment ofthe present invention; and

FIG. 6 is a plan view of the golf ball in FIG. 5.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following will describe in detail the present invention based onpreferred embodiments with appropriate reference to the drawings.

A golf ball 2 shown in FIG. 1 includes a spherical core 4, an innercover 6 positioned outside the core 4, and an outer cover 8 positionedoutside the inner cover 6. The golf ball 2 has a plurality of dimples 10on the surface thereof. Of the surface of the golf ball 2, a part otherthan the dimples 10 is a land 12. The golf ball 2 includes a paint layerand a mark layer on the external side of the outer cover 8, but theselayers are not shown in the drawing.

The golf ball 2 preferably has a diameter of not less than 40 mm and notgreater than 45 mm. From the viewpoint of conformity to the rulesestablished by the United States Golf Association (USGA), the diameteris particularly preferably not less than 42.67 mm. In light ofsuppression of air resistance, the diameter is more preferably notgreater than 44 mm and particularly preferably not greater than 42.80mm.

The golf ball 2 preferably has a weight of not less than 40 g and notgreater than 50 g. In light of attainment of great inertia, the weightis more preferably not less than 44 g and particularly preferably notless than 45.00 g. From the viewpoint of conformity to the rulesestablished by the USGA, the weight is particularly preferably notgreater than 45.93 g.

The core 4 is formed by crosslinking a rubber composition. Examples ofpreferable base rubbers for use in the rubber composition includepolybutadienes, polyisoprenes, styrene-butadiene copolymers,ethylene-propylene-diene copolymers, and natural rubbers. In light ofresilience performance of the golf ball 2, polybutadienes arepreferable. When a polybutadiene and another rubber are used incombination, it is preferred if the polybutadiene is a principalcomponent. Specifically, the proportion of the polybutadiene to theentire base rubber is preferably not less than 50% by weight andparticularly preferably not less than 80% by weight. A polybutadiene inwhich the proportion of cis-1,4 bonds is not less than 80% isparticularly preferable.

The rubber composition of the core 4 preferably includes aco-crosslinking agent. Preferable co-crosslinking agents in light ofdurability and resilience performance of the golf ball 2 are monovalentor bivalent metal salts of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 2to 8 carbon atoms. Examples of preferable co-crosslinking agents includezinc acrylate, magnesium acrylate, zinc methacrylate, and magnesiummethacrylate. Zinc acrylate and zinc methacrylate are particularlypreferable.

The rubber composition may include a metal oxide and an α,β-unsaturatedcarboxylic acid having 2 to 8 carbon atoms. They both react with eachother in the rubber composition to obtain a salt. The salt serves as aco-crosslinking agent. Examples of preferable α,β-unsaturated carboxylicacids include acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Examples of preferablemetal oxides include zinc oxide and magnesium oxide.

The amount of the co-crosslinking agent per 100 parts by weight of thebase rubber is preferably not less than 10 parts by weight and notgreater than 45 parts by weight. The golf ball 2 in which this amount isnot less than 10 parts by weight has excellent resilience performance.From this viewpoint, this amount is more preferably not less than 15parts by weight and particularly preferably not less than 20 parts byweight. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greater than 45parts by weight has excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, thisamount is more preferably not greater than 40 parts by weight andparticularly preferably not greater than 35 parts by weight.

Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 includes an organicperoxide. The organic peroxide serves as a crosslinking initiator. Theorganic peroxide contributes to the durability and the resilienceperformance of the golf ball 2. Examples of suitable organic peroxidesinclude dicumyl peroxide,1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane,2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane, and di-t-butyl peroxide. Anorganic peroxide with particularly high versatility is dicumyl peroxide.

The amount of the organic peroxide per 100 parts by weight of the baserubber is preferably not less than 0.1 parts by weight and not greaterthan 3.0 parts by weight. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is notless than 0.1 parts by weight has excellent resilience performance. Fromthis viewpoint, this amount is more preferably not less than 0.3 partsby weight and particularly preferably not less than 0.5 parts by weight.The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greater than 3.0 parts byweight has excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, this amount ismore preferably not greater than 2.5 parts by weight and particularlypreferably not greater than 2.0 parts by weight.

Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 includes an organicsulfur compound. The organic sulfur compound contributes to flightdistance upon a shot with a driver. Organic sulfur compounds includenaphthalenethiol compounds, benzenethiol compounds, and disulfidecompounds.

Examples of naphthalenethiol compounds include 1-naphthalenethiol,2-naphthalenethiol, 4-chloro-1-naphthalenethiol,4-bromo-1-naphthalenethiol, 1-chloro-2-naphthalenethiol,1-bromo-2-naphthalenethiol, 1-fluoro-2-naphthalenethiol,1-cyano-2-naphthalenethiol, and 1-acetyl-2-naphthalenethiol.

Examples of benzenethiol compounds include benzenethiol,4-chlorobenzenethiol, 3-chlorobenzenethiol, 4-bromobenzenethiol,3-bromobenzenethiol, 4-fluorobenzenethiol, 4-iodobenzenethiol,2,5-dichlorobenzenethiol, 3,5-dichlorobenzenethiol,2,6-dichlorobenzenethiol, 2,5-dibromobenzenethiol,3,5-dibromobenzenethiol, 2-chloro-5-bromobenzenethiol,2,4,6-trichlorobenzenethiol, 2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorobenzenethiol,2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzenethiol, 4-cyanobenzenethiol,2-cyanobenzenethiol, 4-nitrobenzenethiol, and 2-nitrobenzenethiol.

Examples of disulfide compounds include diphenyl disulfide,bis(4-chlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(3-chlorophenyl)disulfide,bis(4-bromophenyl)disulfide, bis(3-bromophenyl)disulfide,bis(4-fluorophenyl)disulfide, bis(4-iodophenyl)disulfide,bis(4-cyanophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,5-dichlorophenyl)disulfide,bis(3,5-dichlorophenyl)disulfide, bis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)disulfide,bis(2,5-dibromophenyl)disulfide, bis(3,5-dibromophenyl)disulfide,bis(2-chloro-5-bromophenyl)disulfide,bis(2-cyano-5-bromophenyl)disulfide,bis(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)disulfide,bis(2-cyano-4-chloro-6-bromophenyl)disulfide,bis(2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenyl)disulfide,bis(2,3,4,5,6-pentachlorophenyl)disulfide, andbis(2,3,4,5,6-pentabromophenyl)disulfide.

The amount of the organic sulfur compound per 100 parts by weight of thebase rubber is preferably not less than 0.1 parts by weight and notgreater than 1.5 parts by weight. The golf ball 2 in which this amountis not less than 0.1 parts by weight has excellent resilienceperformance. From this viewpoint, this amount is more preferably notless than 0.2 parts by weight and particularly preferably not less than0.3 parts by weight. The golf ball 2 in which this amount is not greaterthan 1.5 parts by weight has excellent feel at impact. From thisviewpoint, this amount is more preferably not greater than 1.0 part byweight and particularly preferably not greater than 0.8 parts by weight.Two or more organic sulfur compounds may be used in combination.

Preferably, the rubber composition of the core 4 includes a carboxylicacid or a carboxylate. The carboxylic acid and the carboxylate cancontribute to making the hardness distribution of the core 4appropriate. The appropriate hardness distribution can reduce a spinrate. An example of preferable carboxylic acids is benzoic acid.Examples of preferable carboxylates include zinc octoate and zincstearate. The amount of the carboxylic acid and the carboxylate per 100parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably not less than 0.5 partsby weight, more preferably not less than 0.8 parts by weight, andparticularly preferably not less than 1.0 part by weight. This amount ispreferably not greater than 20 parts by weight, more preferably notgreater than 15 parts by weight, and particularly preferably not greaterthan 10 parts by weight.

The rubber composition of the core 4 may include a filler for thepurpose of specific gravity adjustment and the like. Examples ofsuitable fillers include zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate,and magnesium carbonate. The amount of the filler is determined asappropriate so that the intended specific gravity of the core 4 isachieved.

The rubber composition of the core 4 may include various additives, suchas sulfur, an anti-aging agent, a coloring agent, a plasticizer, adispersant, and the like, in an adequate amount. The rubber compositionmay include crosslinked rubber powder or synthetic resin powder.

The core 4 preferably has a diameter of not less than 35.0 mm and notgreater than 40.5 mm. The golf ball 2 that includes the core 4 having adiameter of not less than 35.0 mm has excellent resilience performance.From this viewpoint, the diameter is more preferably not less than 36.0mm and particularly preferably not less than 36.5 mm. The golf ball 2that includes the core 4 having a diameter of not greater than 40.5 mmhas excellent durability. From this viewpoint, the diameter is morepreferably not greater than 40.0 mm and particularly preferably notgreater than 39.5 mm.

A hardness Hc at the central point of the core 4 is preferably not lessthan 35 and not greater than 70. The golf ball 2 in which the hardnessHc is not less than 35 has excellent resilience performance. From thisviewpoint, the hardness Hc is more preferably not less than 40 andparticularly preferably not less than 45. The golf ball 2 in which thehardness Hc is not greater than 70 has excellent feel at impact. Fromthis viewpoint, the hardness Hc is more preferably not greater than 67and particularly preferably not greater than 65.

The hardness Hc is measured with a Shore C type hardness scale mountedto an automated hardness meter (trade name “digi test II” manufacturedby Heinrich Bareiss Prüfgerätebau GmbH). The hardness scale is pressedagainst the central point of the cross-section of a hemisphere obtainedby cutting the golf ball 2. The measurement is conducted in anenvironment of 23° C.

A hardness Hs at the surface of the core 4 is preferably not less than55 and not greater than 95. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hs isnot less than 55 has excellent resilience performance. From thisviewpoint, the hardness Hs is more preferably not less than 60 andparticularly preferably not less than 65. The golf ball 2 in which thehardness Hs is not greater than 95 has excellent feel at impact. Fromthis viewpoint, the hardness Hs is more preferably not greater than 90and particularly preferably not greater than 85.

The hardness Hs is measured with a Shore C type hardness scale mountedto an automated hardness meter (trade name “digi test II” manufacturedby Heinrich Bareiss Prüfgerátebau GmbH). The hardness scale is pressedagainst the surface of the core 4. The measurement is conducted in anenvironment of 23° C.

The difference B (=Hs−Hc) between the hardness Hs at the surface of thecore 4 and the hardness Hc at the center of the core 4 is preferably notless than 0 and not greater than 40. The golf ball 2 having the core 4in which the difference B is not less than 0 can fly with an appropriatespin rate. From this viewpoint, the difference B is more preferably notless than 10 and particularly preferably not less than 15. The core 4 inwhich the difference B is not greater than 40 is easily produced. Fromthis viewpoint, the difference B is more preferably not greater than 37and particularly preferably not greater than 35.

The core 4 preferably has an amount of compressive deformation Df of notless than 3.0 mm and not greater than 4.5 mm. The golf ball 2 having thecore 4 having an amount of compressive deformation Df of not less than3.0 mm has excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the amount ofcompressive deformation Df is more preferably not less than 3.2 mm andparticularly preferably not less than 3.3 mm. When the golf ball 2having the core 4 having an amount of compressive deformation Df of notgreater than 4.5 mm is hit with a driver, the golf ball 2 can belaunched at a high initial speed. From this viewpoint, the amount ofcompressive deformation Df is more preferably not greater than 4.4 mmand particularly preferably not greater than 4.3 mm.

For measurement of the amount of compressive deformation Df, a YAMADAtype compression tester “SCH” is used. In the tester, the core 4 isplaced on a hard plate made of metal. Next, a cylinder made of metalgradually descends toward the core 4. The core 4, squeezed between thebottom face of the cylinder and the hard plate, becomes deformed. Amigration distance of the cylinder, starting from the state in which aninitial load of 98 N is applied to the core 4 up to the state in which afinal load of 1274 N is applied thereto, is measured. A moving speed ofthe cylinder until the initial load is applied is 0.83 mm/s. A movingspeed of the cylinder after the initial load is applied until the finalload is applied is 1.67 mm/s.

The core 4 preferably has a weight of not less than 10 g and not greaterthan 42 g. The temperature Te for crosslinking the core 4 is not lowerthan 140° C. and not higher than 180° C. The time period Tm forcrosslinking the core 4 is not shorter than 10 minutes and not longerthan 60 minutes. The core 4 may have two or more layers.

The inner cover 6 is positioned outside the core 4. The inner cover 6 isformed from a thermoplastic resin composition. Examples of the basepolymer of the resin composition include ionomer resins, thermoplasticpolyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplasticpolyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers, andthermoplastic polystyrene elastomers. Ionomer resins are particularlypreferable. Ionomer resins are highly elastic. The golf ball 2 thatincludes the inner cover 6 including an ionomer resin has excellentresilience performance. The golf ball 2 has excellent flight distanceupon a shot with a driver.

An ionomer resin and another resin may be used in combination. In thiscase, in light of resilience performance, the ionomer resin is includedas the principal component of the base polymer. The proportion of theionomer resin to the entire base polymer is preferably not less than 50%by weight.

Examples of preferable ionomer resins include binary copolymers formedwith an α-olefin and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8carbon atoms. A preferable binary copolymer includes 80% by weight ormore but 90% by weight or less of an α-olefin, and 10% by weight or morebut 20% by weight or less of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid. Thebinary copolymer has excellent resilience performance. Examples of otherpreferable ionomer resins include ternary copolymers formed with: anα-olefin; an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms;and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate ester having 2 to 22 carbon atoms. Apreferable ternary copolymer includes 70% by weight or more but 85% byweight or less of an α-olefin, 5% by weight or more but 30% by weight orless of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid, and 1% by weight or more but25% by weight or less of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate ester. Theternary copolymer has excellent resilience performance. For the binarycopolymer and the ternary copolymer, preferable α-olefins are ethyleneand propylene, while preferable α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids areacrylic acid and methacrylic acid. A particularly preferable ionomerresin is a copolymer formed with ethylene and acrylic acid. Anotherparticularly preferable ionomer resin is a copolymer formed withethylene and methacrylic acid.

In the binary copolymer and the ternary copolymer, some of the carboxylgroups are neutralized with metal ions. Examples of metal ions for usein neutralization include sodium ions, potassium ions, lithium ions,zinc ions, calcium ions, magnesium ions, aluminum ions, and neodymiumions. The neutralization may be carried out with two or more types ofmetal ions. Particularly suitable metal ions in light of resilienceperformance and durability of the golf ball 2 are sodium ions, zincions, lithium ions, and magnesium ions.

Specific examples of ionomer resins include trade names “Himilan 1555”,“Himilan 1557”, “Himilan 1605”, “Himilan 1706”, “Himilan 1707”, “Himilan1856”, “Himilan 1855”, “Himilan AM7311”, “Himilan AM7315”, “HimilanAM7317”, “Himilan AM7329”, and “Himilan AM7337”, manufactured byDOW-MITSUI POLYCHEMICALS CO., LTD.; trade names “Surlyn 6120”, “Surlyn6910”, “Surlyn 7930”, “Surlyn 7940”, “Surlyn 8140”, “Surlyn 8150”,“Surlyn 8940”, “Surlyn 8945”, “Surlyn 9120”, “Surlyn 9150”, “Surlyn9910”, “Surlyn 9945”, “Surlyn AD8546”, “HPF1000”, and “HPF2000”,manufactured by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; and trade names“IOTEK 7010”, “IOTEK 7030”, “IOTEK 7510”, “IOTEK 7520”, “IOTEK 8000”,and “IOTEK 8030”, manufactured by ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation. Twoor more ionomer resins may be used in combination.

Preferably, the resin composition of the inner cover 6 includes astyrene block-containing thermoplastic elastomer. The styreneblock-containing thermoplastic elastomer includes a polystyrene block asa hard segment, and a soft segment. A typical soft segment is a dieneblock. Examples of compounds for the diene block include butadiene,isoprene, 1,3-pentadiene, and 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene. Butadiene andisoprene are preferable. Two or more compounds may be used incombination.

Examples of styrene block-containing thermoplastic elastomers includestyrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers (SBS),styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers (SIS),styrene-isoprene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers (SIBS), hydrogenatedSBS, hydrogenated SIS, and hydrogenated SIBS. Examples of hydrogenatedSBS include styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymers (SEBS).Examples of hydrogenated SIS include styrene-ethylene-propylene-styreneblock copolymers (SEPS). Examples of hydrogenated SIBS includestyrene-ethylene-ethylene-propylene-styrene block copolymers (SEEPS).

In light of resilience performance of the golf ball 2, the content ofthe styrene component in the styrene block-containing thermoplasticelastomer is preferably not less than 10% by weight, more preferably notless than 12% by weight, and particularly preferably not less than 15%by weight. In light of feel at impact of the golf ball 2, the content ispreferably not greater than 50% by weight, more preferably not greaterthan 47% by weight, and particularly preferably not greater than 45% byweight.

In the present invention, styrene block-containing thermoplasticelastomers include an alloy of an olefin and one or more membersselected from the group consisting of SBS, SIS, SIBS, SEBS, SEPS, andSEEPS. The olefin component in the alloy is presumed to contribute toimprovement of compatibility with another base polymer. The alloy cancontribute to the resilience performance of the golf ball 2. An olefinhaving 2 to 10 carbon atoms is preferable. Examples of suitable olefinsinclude ethylene, propylene, butene, and pentene. Ethylene and propyleneare particularly preferable.

Specific examples of polymer alloys include trade names “TEFABLOCT3221C”, “TEFABLOC T3339C”, “TEFABLOC SJ4400N”, “TEFABLOC SJ5400N”,“TEFABLOC SJ6400N”, “TEFABLOC SJ7400N”, “TEFABLOC SJ8400N”, “TEFABLOCSJ9400N”, and “TEFABLOC SR04”, manufactured by Mitsubishi ChemicalCorporation. Other specific examples of styrene block-containingthermoplastic elastomers include trade name “Epofriend A1010”manufactured by Daicel Corporation, and trade name “SEPTON HG-252”manufactured by Kuraray Co., Ltd.

In light of feel at impact, the proportion of the styreneblock-containing thermoplastic elastomer to the entire base polymer ispreferably not less than 10% by weight, more preferably not less than15% by weight, and particularly preferably not less than 20% by weight.In light of resilience performance, this proportion is preferably notgreater than 50% by weight.

The resin composition of the inner cover 6 may include a coloring agent,a filler, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorber, a lightstabilizer, a fluorescent material, a fluorescent brightener, and thelike in an adequate amount. When the hue of the golf ball 2 is white, atypical coloring agent is titanium dioxide.

The inner cover 6 preferably has a thickness Ti of not less than 0.50 mmand not greater than 1.50 mm. The golf ball 2 in which the thickness Tiis not less than 0.50 mm has excellent feel at impact. From thisviewpoint, the thickness Ti is more preferably not less than 0.70 mm andparticularly preferably not less than 0.80 mm. The golf ball 2 in whichthe thickness Ti is not greater than 1.50 mm has excellent resilienceperformance. From this viewpoint, the thickness Ti is more preferablynot greater than 1.30 mm and particularly preferably not greater than1.20 mm. The thickness is measured at a position immediately below theland 12.

The inner cover 6 preferably has a hardness Hi of not less than 25 andnot greater than 75. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hi is notless than 25 has excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint,the hardness Hi is more preferably not less than 30 and particularlypreferably not less than 35. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Hi isnot greater than 75 has excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint,the hardness Hi is more preferably not greater than 72 and particularlypreferably not greater than 70.

The hardness Hi of the inner cover 6 is measured according to thestandards of “ASTM-D 2240-68”. The hardness Hi is measured with a ShoreD type hardness scale mounted to an automated hardness meter (trade name“digi test II” manufactured by Heinrich Bareiss Prüfgerätebau GmbH). Forthe measurement, a sheet that is formed by hot press, is formed from thesame material as that of the inner cover 6, and has a thickness of about2 mm is used. Prior to the measurement, a sheet is kept at 23° C. fortwo weeks. At the time of measurement, three sheets are stacked.

The outer cover 8 is positioned outside the inner cover 6. The outercover 8 is formed from a thermoplastic resin composition. Examples ofthe base polymer of the resin composition include ionomer resins,thermoplastic polyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers,thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefinelastomers, and thermoplastic polystyrene elastomers. Ionomer resins areparticularly preferable. Ionomer resins are highly elastic. The golfball 2 that includes the outer cover 8 including an ionomer resin hasexcellent resilience performance. The golf ball 2 has excellent flightdistance upon a shot with a driver. The ionomer resin described abovefor the inner cover 6 can be used for the outer cover 8.

An ionomer resin and another resin may be used in combination. In thiscase, in light of resilience performance, the ionomer resin is includedas the principal component of the base polymer. The proportion of theionomer resin to the entire base polymer is preferably not less than 50%by weight, more preferably not less than 70% by weight, and particularlypreferably not less than 80% by weight.

Another base polymer suitable for the outer cover 8 is a polyurethane.When a polyurethane and another resin are used in combination for theouter cover 8, the proportion of the polyurethane to the entire baseresin is preferably not less than 50% by weight, more preferably notless than 60% by weight, and particularly preferably not less than 70%by weight.

The resin composition of the outer cover 8 may include a thermoplasticpolyurethane or may include a thermosetting polyurethane. In light ofproductivity of the golf ball 2, the thermoplastic polyurethane ispreferable. The thermoplastic polyurethane includes a polyurethanecomponent as a hard segment, and a polyester component or a polyethercomponent as a soft segment. The thermoplastic polyurethane is flexible.The outer cover 8 in which the polyurethane is used has excellent scuffresistance.

The thermoplastic polyurethane has a urethane bond within the molecule.The urethane bond can be formed by reacting a polyol with apolyisocyanate. The polyol, as a material for the urethane bond, has aplurality of hydroxyl groups. Low-molecular-weight polyols andhigh-molecular-weight polyols can be used.

Examples of low-molecular-weight polyols include diols, triols,tetraols, and hexaols. Specific examples of diols include ethyleneglycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol,1,3-propanediol, 2-methyl-1,3-propanediol, dipropylene glycol,1,2-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 2,3-butanediol,2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol, neopentyl glycol, pentanediol, hexanediol,heptanediol, octanediol, and 1,6-cyclohexanedimethylol. Aniline diols orbisphenol A diols may be used. Specific examples of triols includeglycerin, trimethylol propane, and hexanetriol. Specific examples oftetraols include pentaerythritol and sorbitol.

Examples of high-molecular-weight polyols include polyether polyols suchas polyoxyethylene glycol (PEG), polyoxypropylene glycol (PPG), andpolytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMG); condensed polyester polyols suchas polyethylene adipate (PEA), polybutylene adipate (PBA), andpolyhexamethylene adipate (PHMA); lactone polyester polyols such aspoly-ε-caprolactone (PCL); polycarbonate polyols such aspolyhexamethylene carbonate; and acrylic polyols. Two or more polyolsmay be used in combination. In light of feel at impact of the golf ball2, the high-molecular-weight polyol has a number average molecularweight of preferably not less than 400 and more preferably not less than1000. The number average molecular weight is preferably not greater than10000.

Examples of polyisocyanates, as a material for the urethane bond,include aromatic diisocyanates, alicyclic diisocyanates, and aliphaticdiisocyanates. Two or more types of diisocyanates may be used incombination.

Examples of aromatic diisocyanates include 2,4-toluene diisocyanate,2,6-toluene diisocyanate, 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI),1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate (NDI), 3,3′-bitolylene-4,4′-diisocyanate(TODI), xylylene diisocyanate (XDI), tetramethylxylylene diisocyanate(TMXDI), and paraphenylene diisocyanate (PPDI). One example of aliphaticdiisocyanates is hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI). Examples of alicyclicdiisocyanates include 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (Hi₂MDI),1,3-bis(isocyanatomethyl)cyclohexane (H₆XDI), isophorone diisocyanate(IPDI), and trans-1,4-cyclohexane diisocyanate (CHDI).4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate is preferable.

Specific examples of the thermoplastic polyurethane include trade names“Elastollan NY80A”, “Elastollan NY82A”, “Elastollan NY83A”, “ElastollanNY84A”, “Elastollan NY85A”, “Elastollan NY88A”, “Elastollan NY90A”,“Elastollan NY95A”, “Elastollan NY97A”, “Elastollan NY585”, and“Elastollan KP016N”, manufactured by BASF Japan Ltd.; and trade names“RESAMINE P4585LS” and “RESAMINE PS62490”, manufactured by DainichiseikaColor & Chemicals Mfg. Co., Ltd.

The resin composition of the outer cover 8 may include a coloring agent,a filler, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorber, a lightstabilizer, a fluorescent material, a fluorescent brightener, and thelike in an adequate amount. When the hue of the golf ball 2 is white, atypical coloring agent is titanium dioxide.

The outer cover 8 preferably has a thickness To of not less than 0.30 mmand not greater than 2.30 mm. In the golf ball 2 in which the thicknessTo is not less than 0.30 mm, the outer cover 8 can contribute toresilience performance or spin performance. From this viewpoint, thethickness To is more preferably not less than 0.35 mm and particularlypreferably not less than 0.40 mm. In the golf ball 2 in which thethickness To is not greater than 2.30 mm, the outer cover 8 does notimpair resilience performance or feel at impact. From this viewpoint,the thickness To is more preferably not greater than 2.20 mm andparticularly preferably not greater than 2.10 mm. The thickness ismeasured at a position immediately below the land 12.

The ratio (Ti/To) of the thickness Ti of the inner cover 6 to thethickness To of the outer cover 8 is preferably not less than 0.3 andnot greater than 3.0.

The outer cover 8 preferably has a hardness Ho of not less than 20 andnot greater than 75. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Ho is notless than 20 has excellent resilience performance. From this viewpoint,the hardness Ho is more preferably not less than 23 and particularlypreferably not less than 25. The golf ball 2 in which the hardness Ho isnot greater than 75 has excellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint,the hardness Ho is more preferably not greater than 72 and particularlypreferably not greater than 70.

The hardness Ho of the outer cover 8 is measured according to thestandards of “ASTM-D 2240-68”. The hardness Ho is measured with a ShoreD type hardness scale mounted to an automated hardness meter (trade name“digi test II” manufactured by Heinrich Bareiss Prüfgerätebau GmbH). Forthe measurement, a sheet that is formed by hot press, is formed from thesame material as that of the outer cover 8, and has a thickness of about2 mm is used. Prior to the measurement, a sheet is kept at 23° C. fortwo weeks. At the time of measurement, three sheets are stacked.

The golf ball 2 may include a reinforcing layer between the inner cover6 and the outer cover 8. The reinforcing layer firmly adheres to theinner cover 6 and also to the outer cover 8. The reinforcing layersuppresses separation of the outer cover 8 from the inner cover 6. Thereinforcing layer is formed from a resin composition. Examples of apreferable base polymer of the reinforcing layer include two-componentcuring type epoxy resins and two-component curing type urethane resins.The reinforcing layer preferably has a thickness of not less than 5 μmand not greater than 30 μm.

An index Cv relates to the specifications of the inner cover 6 and theouter cover 8. The index Cv correlates with the initial speed of thegolf ball 2 when the golf ball 2 is hit with a driver. The index Cv iscalculated by the following mathematical formula.

Cv=(Hi×Ti+Ho×To)/(Ti+To)

The index Cv is preferably not less than 25 and not greater than 75,more preferably not less than 40 and not greater than 60, andparticularly preferably not less than 45 and not greater than 55.

An index Cs relates to the specifications of the inner cover 6 and theouter cover 8. The index Cs correlates with the spin rate of the golfball 2 when the golf ball 2 is hit with a driver. The index Cs iscalculated by the following mathematical formula.

Cs=(Hi×Ti+2Ho×To)/(Ti+2To)

The index Cs is preferably not less than 25 and not greater than 75,more preferably not less than 35 and not greater than 65, andparticularly preferably not less than 42 and not greater than 60.

The golf ball 2 preferably has a compression A of not less than 20 andnot greater than 120. When the golf ball 2 having a compression A of notless than 20 is hit with a driver, the golf ball 2 can be launched at ahigh initial speed. From this viewpoint, the compression A is morepreferably not less than 50 and particularly preferably not less than70. The golf ball 2 having a compression A of not greater than 120 hasexcellent feel at impact. From this viewpoint, the compression A is morepreferably not greater than 110 and particularly preferably not greaterthan 105.

The compression A can be measured with an ATTI compression testermanufactured by Atti Engineering Company.

As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the golf ball 2 has a large number of dimples10 on the surface thereof. The contour of each dimple 10 is circular.The golf ball 2 has dimples A each having a diameter of 4.40 mm; dimplesB each having a diameter of 4.28 mm; dimples C each having a diameter of4.14 mm; dimples D each having a diameter of 3.90 mm; and dimples E eachhaving a diameter of 3.60 mm. The number of types of the dimples 10 isfive.

The number of the dimples A is 60; the number of the dimples B is 158;the number of the dimples C is 72; the number of the dimples D is 36;and the number of the dimples E is 12. The total number of the dimples10 is 338. A dimple pattern is formed by these dimples 10 and the land12.

FIG. 4 shows a cross section of the golf ball 2 along a plane passingthrough the central point of the dimple 10 and the central point of thegolf ball 2. In FIG. 4, the top-to-bottom direction is the depthdirection of the dimple 10. In FIG. 4, a chain double-dashed line 14indicates a phantom sphere. The surface of the phantom sphere 14 is thesurface of the golf ball 2 when it is postulated that no dimple 10exists. The diameter of the phantom sphere 14 is equal to the diameterof the golf ball 2. The dimple 10 is recessed from the surface of thephantom sphere 14. The land 12 coincides with the surface of the phantomsphere 14. In the present embodiment, the cross-sectional shape of eachdimple 10 is substantially a circular arc. The curvature radius of thiscircular arc is shown by reference character CR in FIG. 4.

In FIG. 4, an arrow Dm indicates the diameter of the dimple 10. Thediameter Dm is the distance between two tangent points Ed appearing on atangent line Tg that is drawn tangent to the far opposite ends of thedimple 10. Each tangent point Ed is also the edge of the dimple 10. Theedge Ed defines the contour of the dimple 10.

The diameter Dm of each dimple 10 is preferably not less than 2.0 mm andnot greater than 6.0 mm. The dimple 10 having a diameter Dm of not lessthan 2.0 mm contributes to turbulization. From this viewpoint, thediameter Dm is more preferably not less than 2.5 mm and particularlypreferably not less than 2.8 mm. The dimple 10 having a diameter Dm ofnot greater than 6.0 mm does not impair a fundamental feature of thegolf ball 2 being substantially a sphere. From this viewpoint, thediameter Dm is more preferably not greater than 5.5 mm and particularlypreferably not greater than 5.0 mm.

In FIG. 4, a double ended arrow Dp1 indicates a first depth of thedimple 10. The first depth Dp1 is the distance between the deepest partof the dimple 10 and the surface of the phantom sphere 14. In FIG. 4, adouble ended arrow Dp2 indicates a second depth of the dimple 10. Thesecond depth Dp2 is the distance between the deepest part of the dimple10 and the tangent line Tg.

In light of suppression of rising of the golf ball 2 during flight, thefirst depth Dp1 of each dimple 10 is preferably not less than 0.10 mm,more preferably not less than 0.13 mm, and particularly preferably notless than 0.15 mm. In light of suppression of dropping of the golf ball2 during flight, the first depth Dp1 is preferably not greater than 0.65mm, more preferably not greater than 0.60 mm, and particularlypreferably not greater than 0.55 mm.

The area S of the dimple 10 is the area of a region surrounded by thecontour line of the dimple 10 when the central point of the golf ball 2is viewed at infinity. In the case of the dimple 10 which has a circularshape, the area S is calculated by the following mathematical formula.

S=(Dm/2)²*π

In the golf ball 2 shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the area of each dimple A is15.20 mm²; the area of each dimple B is 14.39 mm²; the area of eachdimple C is 13.46 mm²; the area of each dimple D is 11.95 mm²; and thearea of each dimple E is 10.18 mm².

In the present invention, the ratio of the sum of the areas S of all thedimples 10 relative to the surface area of the phantom sphere 14 isreferred to as an occupation ratio So. From the viewpoint of achievingsufficient turbulization, the occupation ratio So is preferably not lessthan 78%, more preferably not less than 80%, and particularly preferablynot less than 82%. The occupation ratio So is preferably not greaterthan 95%. In the golf ball 2 shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the total area ofthe dimples 10 is 4707 mm². The surface area of the phantom sphere 14 ofthe golf ball 2 is 5728 mm², so that the occupation ratio So is 82.2%.

From the viewpoint of achieving a sufficient occupation ratio So, thetotal number of the dimples 10 is preferably not less than 250, morepreferably not less than 280, and particularly preferably not less than300. From the viewpoint that each dimple 10 can contribute toturbulization, the total number is preferably not greater than 450, morepreferably not greater than 410, and particularly preferably not greaterthan 390.

In the present invention, the “volume of the dimple” means the volume ofa portion surrounded by the surface of the dimple 10 and the planeincluding the contour of the dimple 10. The total volume D of thedimples 10 is preferably not less than 200 mm³ and not greater than 500mm³. With the golf ball 2 in which the total volume D is not less than200 mm³, rising of the golf ball 2 during flight is suppressed. Fromthis viewpoint, the total volume D is more preferably not less than 250mm³ and particularly preferably not less than 270 mm³. With the golfball 2 in which the total volume D is not greater than 500 mm³, droppingof the golf ball 2 during flight is suppressed. From this viewpoint, thetotal volume D is more preferably not greater than 400 mm³ andparticularly preferably not greater than 370 mm³.

In the golf ball 2 shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the volume of each dimple Ais 1.009 mm³; the volume of each dimple B is 0.954 mm³; the volume ofeach dimple C is 0.842 mm³; the volume of each dimple D is 0.715 mm³;and the volume of each dimple E is 0.607 mm³. Therefore, the sum D ofthe volumes of all the dimples 10 is 305 mm³.

The golf ball 2 satisfies the following mathematical formulas (I) and(II).

Vw=54+0.01(2.5A−B+5Cv)≥58.0   (I)

0.08X ²−4.25X+345−20≤D≤0.08X ²−4.25X+345+20   (II)

A: the compression (Atti) of the golf ball 2

B: the hardness difference (Shore C) between the surface and the centerof the core 4

Cv: (Hi×Ti+Ho×To)/(Ti+To)

Cs: (Hi×Ti+2Ho×To)/(Ti+2To)

D: the total volume (mm³) of the dimples 10

X: Sw/Vw

Hi: the hardness (Shore D) of the inner cover 6

Ho: the hardness (Shore D) of the outer cover 8

Ti: the thickness (mm) of the inner cover 6

To: the thickness (mm) of the outer cover 8

Sw: 3000+10(A−B−1.5Cs)

In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the mathematical formula (I), theindex Vw is not less than 58.0. When the golf ball 2 in which the indexVw is not less than 58.0 is hit with a driver, the golf ball 2 islaunched at a high initial speed. The golf ball 2 has excellent flightperformance upon a shot with a driver. In light of flight performance,the index Vw is more preferably not less than 58.2 and particularlypreferably not less than 58.4. The index Vw is preferably not greaterthan 59.5, more preferably not greater than 59.3, and particularlypreferably not greater than 59.1.

In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the mathematical formula (II), thebalance between the lift force caused due to spin and the lift forcecaused due to the dimples 10 is appropriate. With the golf ball 2, thereis little loss of kinetic energy. When the golf ball 2 is hit with adriver, the trajectory height and the flight duration are appropriate.The golf ball 2 has excellent flight performance upon a shot with adriver. In light of flight performance, the golf ball 2 more preferablysatisfies the following mathematical formula.

0.08X ²−4.25X+345−15≤D≤0.08X ²−4.25X+345+15

In light of flight performance, the golf ball 2 particularly preferablysatisfies the following mathematical formula.

0.08X ²−4.25X+345−10≤D≤0.08X ²−4.25X+345+10

Preferably, the golf ball 2 satisfies the following mathematical formula(III).

Sa=4500+10(A−0.5B−2Cs)≥4000   (III)

In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the mathematical formula (III), theindex Sa is not less than 4000. When the golf ball 2 in which the indexSa is not less than 4000 is hit with a golf club, the golf ball 2 islaunched with an appropriate spin rate. The golf ball 2 has excellentflight performance and controllability. From these viewpoints, the indexSa is more preferably not less than 4050 and particularly preferably notless than 4100. The index Sa is preferably not greater than 4700, morepreferably not greater than 4650, and particularly preferably notgreater than 4600.

Preferably, a lift force coefficient CL of the golf ball 2 satisfies thefollowing mathematical formula (IV).

CLL≤CL≤CLU

CLU: Sw/60×(−9.5×10⁻⁶×D+6.1×10⁻³)+(1.871×10⁻⁴×D−3.5×10⁻³)

CLL: Sw/60×(−3.8×10⁻⁶×D+3.0×10⁻³)+(4.52×10⁻⁵×D+8.32×10⁻²)   (IV)

In the golf ball 2 that satisfies the mathematical formula (IV), thelift force caused due to the dimples 10 is appropriate. With the golfball 2, rising and dropping of the golf ball 2 during flight aresuppressed. The golf ball 2 has excellent flight performance upon a shotwith a driver.

EXAMPLES

The following will show the effects of the present invention by means ofExamples, but the present invention should not be construed in a limitedmanner on the basis of the description of these Examples.

Example 1

A rubber composition was obtained by kneading 100 parts by weight of ahigh-cis polybutadiene (trade name “BR-730”, manufactured by JSRCorporation), an appropriate amount of zinc diacrylate, 5 parts byweight of zinc oxide, an appropriate amount of barium sulfate, 2.0 partsby weight of benzoic acid, 0.5 parts by weight of diphenyl disulfide,and 0.9 parts by weight of dicumyl peroxide. This rubber composition wasplaced into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having ahemispherical cavity, and heated to obtain a core with a diameter of38.2 mm. The amount of zinc diacrylate was adjusted such that apredetermined amount of compressive deformation Df was obtained. Theamount of barium sulfate was adjusted such that a core having apredetermined weight was obtained. The crosslinking temperature Te was160° C. The crosslinking time period Tm was 20 minutes.

A resin composition a was obtained by kneading 30 parts by weight of anionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan AM7337”), 30 parts by weightof another ionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan AM7329”), 40 partsby weight of a styrene block-containing thermoplastic elastomer (theaforementioned “TEFABLOC T3221C”), 4 parts by weight of titaniumdioxide, and 0.2 parts by weight of a light stabilizer (trade name“JF-90”, manufactured by Johoku Chemical Co., Ltd.) with a twin-screwkneading extruder. The core was placed into a mold including upper andlower mold halves each having a hemispherical cavity. The core wascovered with the resin composition a by injection molding to form aninner cover. The thickness of the inner cover was 1.00 mm.

A resin composition c was obtained by kneading 40 parts by weight of anionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan AM7329”), 52 parts by weightof another ionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan 1605”), 8 parts byweight of a styrene block-containing thermoplastic elastomer (theaforementioned “TEFABLOC T3221C”), 4 parts by weight of titaniumdioxide, and 0.2 parts by weight of a light stabilizer (theaforementioned “JF-90”) with a twin-screw kneading extruder. The sphereconsisting of the core and the inner cover was placed into a moldincluding upper and lower mold halves each having a hemisphericalcavity. The sphere was covered with the resin composition c by injectionmolding to form an outer cover. The thickness of the outer cover was1.25 mm.

A clear paint including a two-component curing type polyurethane as abase material was applied to this outer cover to obtain a golf ball ofExample 1 with a diameter of about 42.7 mm and a weight of about 45.6 g.Dimple specifications I-1 of the golf ball are shown in detail in Tables3 and 4 below. FIG. 2 is a plan view of the golf ball, and FIG. 3 is afront view of the golf ball.

Examples 2 to 21 and Comparative Examples 1 to 15

Golf balls of Examples 2 to 21 and Comparative Examples 1 to 15 wereobtained in the same manner as Example 1, except the specifications ofthe core, the inner cover, the outer cover, and the dimples were asshown in Tables 5 to 10 below. The compositions of the inner cover andthe outer cover are shown in detail in Table 1 below. The specificationsof the dimples are shown in detail in Tables 3 and 4 below.

Example 22

A rubber composition was obtained by kneading 100 parts by weight of ahigh-cis polybutadiene (trade name “BR-730”, manufactured by JSRCorporation), an appropriate amount of zinc diacrylate, 5 parts byweight of zinc oxide, an appropriate amount of barium sulfate, 2.0 partsby weight of benzoic acid, 0.5 parts by weight of diphenyl disulfide,and 0.9 parts by weight of dicumyl peroxide. This rubber composition wasplaced into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having ahemispherical cavity, and heated to obtain a core with a diameter of39.6 mm. The amount of zinc diacrylate was adjusted such that apredetermined amount of compressive deformation Df was obtained. Theamount of barium sulfate was adjusted such that a core having apredetermined weight was obtained. The crosslinking temperature Te was160° C. The crosslinking time period Tm was 20 minutes.

A resin composition d was obtained by kneading 50 parts by weight of anionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan AM7329”), 42 parts by weightof another ionomer resin (the aforementioned “Himilan 1605”), 8 parts byweight of still another ionomer resin (the aforementioned “Surlyn8150”), 4 parts by weight of titanium dioxide, and 0.2 parts by weightof a light stabilizer (trade name “JF-90”, manufactured by JohokuChemical Co., Ltd.) with a twin-screw kneading extruder. The core wasplaced into a mold including upper and lower mold halves each having ahemispherical cavity. The core was covered with the resin composition dby injection molding to form an inner cover. The thickness of the innercover was 1.00 mm.

A paint composition (trade name “POLIN 750LE”, manufactured by SHINTOPAINT CO., LTD.) including a two-component curing type epoxy resin as abase polymer was prepared. The base material liquid of this paintcomposition includes 30 parts by weight of a bisphenol A type epoxyresin and 70 parts by weight of a solvent. The curing agent liquid ofthis paint composition includes 40 parts by weight of a modifiedpolyamide amine, 55 parts by weight of a solvent, and 5 parts by weightof titanium dioxide. The weight ratio of the base material liquid to thecuring agent liquid is 1/1. This paint composition was applied to thesurface of the inner cover with a spray gun, and kept at 23° C. for 12hours to obtain a reinforcing layer. The thickness of the reinforcinglayer was 10 μm.

A resin composition f was obtained by kneading 100 parts by weight of athermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (the aforementioned “ElastollanNY84A”), 4 parts by weight of titanium dioxide, and 0.2 parts by weightof a light stabilizer (trade name “JF-90”, manufactured by JohokuChemical Co., Ltd.) with a twin-screw kneading extruder. Half shellswere obtained from this resin composition f by compression molding. Thesphere consisting of the core and the inner cover was covered with twoof these half shells. These half shells and the sphere were placed intoa final mold that includes upper and lower mold halves each having ahemispherical cavity and having a large number of pimples on its cavityface, and an outer cover was obtained by compression molding. Thethickness of the outer cover was 0.55 mm. Dimples having a shape that isthe inverted shape of the pimples were formed on the outer cover.

A clear paint including a two-component curing type polyurethane as abase material was applied to this outer cover to obtain a golf ball ofExample 22 with a diameter of about 42.7 mm and a weight of about 45.6g. Dimple specifications I-2 of the golf ball are shown in detail inTables 3 and 4 below. FIG. 2 is a plan view of the golf ball, and FIG. 3is a front view of the golf ball.

Examples 23 to 35 and Comparative Examples 16 to 21

Golf balls of Examples 23 to 35 and Comparative Examples 16 to 21 wereobtained in the same manner as Example 22, except the specifications ofthe core, the inner cover, the outer cover, and the dimples were asshown in Tables 11 to 14 below. The composition of the inner cover isshown in detail in Table 1 below. The composition of the outer cover isshown in detail in Table 2 below. The specifications of the dimples areshown in detail in Tables 3 and 4 below.

[Flight Test]

A driver with a head made of a titanium alloy (trade name “XXIO 9”,manufactured by Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., shaft hardness: R,loft angle: 10.5°) was attached to a swing machine manufactured by GolfLaboratories, Inc. A golf ball was hit under a condition of a head speedof 40 m/sec, and the flight distance was measured. The flight distanceis the distance from the launch point to the stop point. During thetest, the weather was almost windless. The average value of dataobtained by 12 measurements is shown in Tables 5 to 14 below.

TABLE 1 Composition of Cover (parts by weight) a b c d Himilan AM7337 3040 — — Himilan AM7329 30 40 40 50 Himilan #1605 — — 52 42 Surlyn #8150 —— — 8 TEFABLOC T3221C 40 20 8 — Titanium dioxide 4 4 4 4 JF-90 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 Hardness (Shore D) 40 52 59 66

TABLE 2 Composition of Cover (parts by weight) e f g Elastollan NY80A100 — — Elastollan NY84A — 100 — Elastollan NY88A — — 100 Titaniumdioxide 4 4 4 JF-90 0.2 0.2 0.2 Hardness (Shore D) 27 31 36

TABLE 3 Specifications of Dimples Dm Dp2 Dp1 CR Volume Type Number (mm)(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm³) I-1 A 60 4.40 0.1325 0.2462 18.33 1.009 B 158 4.280.1325 0.2400 17.35 0.954 C 72 4.14 0.1250 0.2256 17.20 0.842 D 36 3.900.1195 0.2087 15.97 0.715 E 12 3.60 0.1190 0.1950 13.67 0.607 I-2 A 604.40 0.1410 0.2547 17.23 1.073 B 158 4.28 0.1410 0.2485 16.31 1.016 C 724.14 0.1335 0.2341 16.12 0.900 D 36 3.90 0.1280 0.2172 14.92 0.766 E 123.60 0.1275 0.2035 12.77 0.650 I-3 A 60 4.40 0.1495 0.2632 16.26 1.138 B158 4.28 0.1495 0.2570 15.39 1.077 C 72 4.14 0.1420 0.2426 15.16 0.957 D36 3.90 0.1360 0.2252 14.05 0.814 E 12 3.60 0.1355 0.2115 12.02 0.691I-4 A 60 4.40 0.1580 0.2717 15.40 1.203 B 158 4.28 0.1580 0.2655 14.571.139 C 72 4.14 0.1505 0.2511 14.31 1.015 D 36 3.90 0.1440 0.2332 13.280.862 E 12 3.60 0.1435 0.2195 11.36 0.732 II-1 A 130 3.80 0.1650 0.249711.02 0.938 B 50 3.50 0.1650 0.2368 9.36 0.796 C 60 3.20 0.1630 0.22307.93 0.658 D 180 3.00 0.1625 0.2153 7.00 0.577 II-2 A 130 3.80 0.19700.2817 9.26 1.121 B 50 3.50 0.1970 0.2688 7.87 0.952 C 60 3.20 0.19500.2550 6.66 0.788 D 180 3.00 0.1945 0.2473 5.88 0.691

TABLE 4 Specifications of Dimples I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 II-1 II-2 Front viewFIG. 2 FIG. 2 FIG. 2 FIG. 2 FIG. 5 FIG. 5 Plan view FIG. 3 FIG. 3 FIG. 3FIG. 3 FIG. 6 FIG. 6 Total number 338 338 338 338 420 420 Total Volume305 325 345 365 305 365 D (mm³) Occupation 82.2 82.2 82.2 82.2 64.8 64.8ratio (%)

TABLE 5 Evaluation Results Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Com. 1 Com. 2 Core Df(mm) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 Hs (Shore C) 78 78 78 78 72 72 He (Shore C)58 58 58 58 52 52 Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 20 2020 20 B = Hs − Hc 20 20 20 20 20 20 Inner cover a a a a a a Ti (mm) 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40 Outer cover c cc c c c To (mm) 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Ho (Shore D) 59 59 59 5959 59 A (Atti) 80 80 80 80 60 60 Cv 51 51 51 51 51 51 Cs 54 54 54 54 5454 Dimples I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 D (mm³) 305 305 325 345 305 305 Sw2796 2796 2796 2796 2596 2596 Vw 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3 57.8 57.8 X = Sw/Vw47.9 47.9 47.9 47.9 44.9 44.9 0.08X²− 305 305 305 305 295 295 0.08X²−345 345 345 345 335 335 Sa 4129 4129 4129 4129 3929 3929 a1 (10⁻⁵) 320320 301 282 320 320 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5357 5357 5731 6105 5357 5357 a2 (10⁻⁵)184 184 177 169 184 184 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9699 9699 9789 9879 9699 9699 CLU0.203 0.203 0.198 0.193 0.192 0.192 CLL 0.183 0.183 0.180 0.178 0.1770.177 CL 0.192 0.203 0.188 0.185 0.185 0.194 Distance (m) 203.4 202.6202.4 201.9 201.5 200.5

TABLE 6 Evaluation Results Com. 3 Com. 4 Com. 5 Com. 6 Ex. 5 Ex. 6 CoreDf (mm) 4.6 4.6 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Hs (Shore C) 72 72 84 84 84 84 He (ShoreC) 52 52 64 64 64 64 Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 2020 20 20 B = Hs − Hc 20 20 20 20 20 20 Inner cover a a a a a a Ti (mm)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40 Outer coverc c c c c c To (mm) 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Ho (Shore D) 59 59 5959 59 59 A (Atti) 60 60 100 100 100 100 Cv 51 51 51 51 51 51 Cs 54 54 5454 54 54 Dimples I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 D (mm³) 325 345 305 305 325345 Sw 2596 2596 2996 2996 2996 2996 Vw 57.8 57.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 X= Sw/Vw 44.9 44.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 0.08X²− 295 295 316 316 316 3160.08X²− 335 335 356 356 356 356 Sa 3929 3929 4329 4329 4329 4329 a1(10⁻⁵) 301 282 320 320 301 282 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5731 6105 5357 5357 5731 6105a2 (10⁻⁵) 177 169 184 184 177 169 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9789 9879 9699 9699 97899879 CLU 0.188 0.183 0.213 0.213 0.208 0.202 CLL 0.174 0.172 0.189 0.1890.186 0.183 CL 0.181 0.178 0.199 0.211 0.195 0.191 Distance (m) 201.2199.7 201.1 200.4 203.2 203.7

TABLE 7 Evaluation Results Com. 7 Com. 8 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 Ex. 9 Ex. 10 CoreDf (mm) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.2 4.2 Hs (Shore C) 80 80 80 80 76 76 He (ShoreC) 60 60 60 60 56 56 Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 2020 20 20 B = Hs − Hc 20 20 20 20 20 20 Inner cover a a a a a a Ti (mm)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40 Outer coverb b b b d d To (mm) 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Ho (Shore D) 52 52 5252 66 66 A (Atti) 80 80 80 80 80 80 Cv 47 47 47 47 54 54 Cs 49 49 49 4959 59 Dimples I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 D (mm³) 305 305 325 345 305 305Sw 2871 2871 2871 2871 2721 2721 Vw 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.5 58.5 X =Sw/Vw 49.4 49.4 49.4 49.4 46.5 46.5 0.08X²− 310 310 310 310 300 3000.08X²− 350 350 350 350 340 340 Sa 4229 4229 4229 4229 4029 4029 a1(10⁻⁵) 320 320 301 282 320 320 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5357 5357 5731 6105 5357 5357a2 (10⁻⁵) 184 184 177 169 184 184 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9699 9699 9789 9879 96999699 CLU 0.207 0.207 0.201 0.196 0.199 0.199 CLL 0.185 0.185 0.182 0.1800.180 0.180 CL 0.196 0.207 0.192 0.188 0.189 0.199 Distance (m) 200.7200.1 201.7 202.7 204.1 203.3

TABLE 8 Evaluation Results Ex. 11 Com. 9 Com. 10 Com. 11 Ex. 12 Ex. 13Core Df (mm) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Hs (Shore C) 76 76 78 78 78 78 He(Shore C) 56 56 58 58 58 58 Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min)20 20 20 20 20 20 B = Hs − Hc 20 20 20 20 20 20 Inner cover a a a a a aTi (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40Outer cover d d c c c c To (mm) 1.25 1.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Ho (ShoreD) 66 66 59 59 59 59 A (Atti) 80 80 80 80 80 80 Cv 54 54 46 46 46 46 Cs59 59 50 50 50 50 Dimples I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 D (mm³) 325 345 305305 325 345 Sw 2721 2721 2858 2858 2858 2858 Vw 58.5 58.5 58.1 58.1 58.158.1 X = Sw/Vw 46.5 46.5 49.2 49.2 49.2 49.2 0.08X²− 300 300 309 309 309309 0.08X²− 340 340 349 349 349 349 Sa 4029 4029 4210 4210 4210 4210 a1(10⁻⁵) 301 282 320 320 301 282 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5731 6105 5357 5357 5731 6105a2 (10⁻⁵) 177 169 184 184 177 169 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9789 9879 9699 9699 97899879 CLU 0.194 0.189 0.206 0.206 0.201 0.195 CLL 0.178 0.175 0.185 0.1850.182 0.179 CL 0.185 0.181 0.195 0.206 0.191 0.187 Distance (m) 203.1201.5 200.8 200.2 201.7 202.6

TABLE 9 Evaluation Results Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Com. 12 Com. 13 Com. 14Core Df (mm) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Hs (Shore C) 78 78 78 78 72 72 He(Shore C) 58 58 58 58 62 62 Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 150 150 Tm (min)20 20 20 20 25 25 B = Hs − Hc 20 20 20 20 10 10 Inner cover a a a a a aTi (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40Outer cover c c c c c c To (mm) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.25 1.25 Ho (ShoreD) 59 59 59 59 59 59 A (Atti) 80 80 80 80 80 80 Cv 53 53 53 53 51 51 Cs55 55 55 55 54 54 Dimples I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 D (mm³) 305 305 325345 305 305 Sw 2772 2772 2772 2772 2896 2896 Vw 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.458.4 X = Sw/Vw 47.4 47.4 47.4 47.4 49.6 49.6 0.08X²− 303 303 303 303 311311 0.08X²− 343 343 343 343 351 351 Sa 4096 4096 4096 4096 4179 4179 a1(10⁻⁵) 320 320 301 282 320 320 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5357 5357 5731 6105 5357 5357a2 (10⁻⁵) 184 184 177 169 184 184 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9699 9699 9789 9879 96999699 CLU 0.202 0.202 0.196 0.191 0.208 0.208 CLL 0.182 0.182 0.179 0.1770.186 0.186 CL 0.191 0.201 0.187 0.183 0.196 0.207 Distance (m) 203.3202.8 202.3 200.8 201.0 200.4

TABLE 10 Evaluation Results Ex. 17 Ex. 18 Ex. 19 Ex. 20 Ex. 21 Com. 15Core Df (mm) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Hs (Shore C) 72 72 84 84 84 84 He(Shore C) 62 62 54 54 54 54 Te (° C.) 150 150 170 170 170 170 Tm (min)25 25 15 15 15 15 B = 10 10 30 30 30 30 Hs − Hc Inner cover a a a a a aTi (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hi (Shore D) 40 40 40 40 40 40Outer cover c c c c c c To (mm) 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Ho (ShoreD) 59 59 59 59 59 59 A (Atti) 80 80 80 80 80 80 Cv 51 51 51 51 51 51 Cs54 54 54 54 54 54 Dimples I-2 I-3 I-1 II-1 I-2 I-3 D (mm³) 325 345 305305 325 345 Sw 2896 2896 2696 2696 2696 2696 Vw 58.4 58.4 58.2 58.2 58.258.2 X = Sw/Vw 49.6 49.6 46.3 46.3 46.3 46.3 0.08X²− 311 311 300 300 300300 0.08X²− 351 351 340 340 340 340 Sa 4179 4179 4079 4079 4079 4079 a1(10⁻⁵) 301 282 320 320 301 282 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5731 6105 5357 5357 5731 6105a2 (10⁻⁵) 177 169 184 184 177 169 b2 (10⁻⁵) 9789 9879 9699 9699 97899879 CLU 0.203 0.197 0.197 0.197 0.193 0.188 CLL 0.183 0.180 0.180 0.1800.177 0.175 CL 0.192 0.188 0.188 0.198 0.185 0.181 Distance (m) 202.0203.0 202.7 201.7 202.5 200.5

TABLE 11 Evaluation Results Ex. 22 Com. 16 Ex. 23 Com. 17 Ex. 24 Core Df3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.6 (mm) Hs (Shore 84 84 84 84 82 C) Hc (Shore 64 64 6464 62 C) Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 20 20 20 B = 20 2020 20 20 Hs − Hc Inner cover d d d d d Ti (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Hi (Shore 66 66 66 66 66 D) Outer cover f f f f f To (mm) 0.55 0.55 0.550.55 0.75 Ho (Shore 31 31 31 31 31 D) A (Atti) 100 100 100 100 100 Cv 5454 54 54 51 Cs 48 48 48 48 45 Dimples I-2 II-2 I-3 I-4 I-2 D (mm³) 325365 345 365 325 Sw 3085 3085 3085 3085 3125 Vw 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 58.9X = 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 53.1 Sw/Vw 0.08X²− 322 322 322 322 325 0.08X²−362 362 362 362 365 Sa 4447 4447 4447 4447 4500 a1 (10⁻⁵) 301 263 282263 301 b1 (10⁻⁵) 5731 6479 6105 6479 5731 a2 (10⁻⁵) 177 161 169 161 177b2 (10⁻⁵) 9789 9970 9879 9970 9789 CLU 0.212 0.200 0.206 0.200 0.214 CLL0.189 0.183 0.186 0.183 0.190 CL 0.198 0.182 0.194 0.190 0.200 Distance202.2 200.5 203.0 201.5 201.8 (m)

TABLE 12 Evaluation Results Ex. 25 Ex. 26 Ex. 27 Com. 18 Ex. 28 Core Df3.6 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.8 (mm) Hs (Shore 82 82 82 80 80 C) He (Shore 62 62 6260 60 C) Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 20 20 20 B = 20 2020 20 20 Hs − Hc Inner cover d d d d d Ti (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Hi (Shore 66 66 66 66 66 D) Outer cover f f f f f To (mm) 0.75 0.75 0.750.95 0.95 Ho (Shore 31 31 31 31 31 D) A (Atti) 100 100 100 100 100 Cv 5151 51 49 49 Cs 45 45 45 43 43 Dimples II-2 I-3 I-4 I-2 II-2 D (mm³) 365345 365 325 365 Sw 3125 3125 3125 3154 3154 Vw 58.9 58.9 58.9 58.7 58.7X = 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.7 53.7 Sw/Vw 0.08X²− 325 325 325 327 327 0.08X²−365 365 365 367 367 Sa 4500 4500 4500 4539 4539 a1 (10⁻⁵) 263 282 263301 263 b1 (10⁻⁵) 6479 6105 6479 5731 6479 a2 (10⁻⁵) 161 169 161 177 161b2 (10⁻⁵) 9970 9879 9970 9789 9970 CLU 0.202 0.208 0.202 0.216 0.203 CLL0.184 0.187 0.184 0.191 0.184 CL 0.183 0.196 0.191 0.202 0.184 Distance201.6 202.3 201.8 201.3 201.9 (m)

TABLE 13 Evaluation Results Ex. 29 Ex. 30 Com. 19 Ex. 31 Ex. 32 Core Df3.8 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 (mm) Hs (Shore 80 80 84 84 84 C) He (Shore 60 60 6464 64 C) Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 20 20 20 B = 20 2020 20 20 Hs − Hc Inner cover d d d d d Ti (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Hi (Shore 66 66 66 66 66 D) Outer cover f f e e e To (mm) 0.95 0.95 0.750.75 0.75 Ho (Shore 31 31 27 27 27 D) A (Atti) 100 100 100 100 100 Cv 4949 49 49 49 Cs 43 43 43 43 43 Dimples I-3 I-4 I-2 II-2 I-3 D (mm³) 345365 325 365 345 Sw 3154 3154 3161 3161 3161 Vw 58.7 58.7 58.8 58.8 58.8X = 53.7 53.7 538 538 53.8 Sw/Vw 0.08X²− 327 327 328 328 328 0.08X²− 367367 368 368 368 Sa 4539 4539 4548 4548 4548 a1 (10⁻⁵) 282 263 301 263282 b1 (10⁻⁵) 0.061 0.064 0.057 0.064 0.061 a2 (10⁻⁵) 169 161 177 161169 b2 (10⁻⁵) 0.098 0.099 0.097 0.099 0.098 CLU 0.209 0.203 0.216 0.2030.210 CLL 0.188 0.184 0.191 0.185 0.188 CL 0.197 0.192 0.202 0.185 0.197Distance 201.9 201.8 201.3 201.9 201.9 (m)

TABLE 14 Evaluation Results Ex. 33 Ex. 34 Com. 20 Ex. 35 Com. 21 Core Df3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 (mm) Hs (Shore 84 80 80 80 80 C) Hc (Shore 64 60 6060 60 C) Te (° C.) 160 160 160 160 160 Tm (min) 20 20 20 20 20 B = 20 2020 20 20 Hs − Hc Inner cover d d d d d Ti (mm) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Hi (Shore 66 66 66 66 66 D) Outer cover e g g g g To (mm) 0.75 0.75 0.750.75 0.75 Ho (Shore 27 36 36 36 36 D) A (Atti) 100 100 100 100 100 Cv 4953 53 53 53 Cs 43 48 48 48 48 Dimples I-4 I-2 II-2 I-3 I-4 D (mm³) 365325 365 345 365 Sw 3161 3080 3080 3080 3080 Vw 58.8 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0X = 53.8 52.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 Sw/Vw 0.08X²− 328 321 321 321 321 0.08X²−368 361 361 361 361 Sa 4548 4440 4440 4440 4440 a1 (10⁻⁵) 263 301 263282 263 b1 (10⁻⁵) 6479 5731 6479 6105 6479 a2 (10⁻⁵) 161 177 161 169 161b2 (10⁻⁵) 9970 9789 9970 9879 9970 CLU 0.203 0.212 0.200 0.206 0.200 CLL0.185 0.188 0.182 0.185 0.182 CL 0.193 0.198 0.181 0.194 0.189 Distance201.8 202.1 200.4 202.9 201.4 (m)

As shown in Tables 5 to 14, the golf ball of each Example has excellentflight performance. From the evaluation results, advantages of thepresent invention are clear.

The golf ball according to the present invention is suitable for, forexample, playing golf on golf courses and practicing at driving ranges.The above descriptions are merely illustrative examples, and variousmodifications can be made without departing from the principles of thepresent invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A golf ball comprising a core, an inner coverpositioned outside the core, and an outer cover positioned outside theinner cover, wherein the golf ball has a plurality of dimples on asurface thereof, and the golf ball satisfies the following mathematicalformulas (I) and (II),Vw=54+0.01(2.5A−B+5Cv)≥58.0   (I),0.08X ²−4.25X+345−20≤D≤0.08X ²−4.25X+345+20   (II), A: a compression(Atti) of the golf ball, B: a hardness difference (Shore C) between asurface and a center of the core,Cv: (Hi×Ti+Ho×To)/(Ti+To),Cs: (Hi×Ti+2Ho×To)/(Ti+2To), D: a dimple total volume (mm³),X: Sw/Vw, Hi: a hardness (Shore D) of the inner cover, Ho: a hardness(Shore D) of the outer cover, Ti: a thickness (mm) of the inner cover,To: a thickness (mm) of the outer cover,Sw: 3000+10(A−B−1.5Cs).
 2. The golf ball according to claim 1, whereinthe golf ball further satisfies the following mathematical formula(III),Sa=4500+10(A−0.5B−2Cs)≥4000   (III).
 3. The golf ball according to claim1, wherein a lift force coefficient CL of the golf ball satisfies thefollowing mathematical formula (IV),CLL≤CL≤CLUCLU: Sw/60×(−9.5×10⁻⁶×D+6.1×10⁻³)+(1.871×10⁻⁴×D−3.5×10⁻³),CLL: Sw/60×(−3.8×10⁻⁶×D+3.0×10⁻³)+(4.52×10⁻⁵×D+8.32×10⁻²).   (IV)
 4. Thegolf ball according to claim 1, wherein a hardness (shore C) of thecenter of the core is not less than 35 and not greater than
 70. 5. Thegolf ball according to claim 1, wherein a hardness (shore C) of thesurface of the core is not less than 55 and not greater than
 95. 6. Thegolf ball according to claim 1, wherein the hardness difference B is notless than 0 and not greater than
 40. 7. The golf ball according to claim1, wherein an amount of compressive deformation Df of the core is notless than 3.0 mm and not greater than 4.5 mm.
 8. The golf ball accordingto claim 1, wherein the thickness Ti of the inner cover is not less than0.50 mm and not greater than 1.50 mm.
 9. The golf ball according toclaim 1, wherein the hardness Hi of the inner cover is not less than 25and not greater than
 75. 10. The golf ball according to claim 1, whereinthe thickness To of the outer cover is not less than 0.30 mm and notgreater than 2.30 mm.
 11. The golf ball according to claim 1, whereinthe hardness Ho of the outer cover is not less than 20 and not greaterthan
 75. 12. The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the index Cv isnot less than 25 and not greater than
 75. 13. The golf ball according toclaim 1, wherein the index Cs is not less than 25 and not greater than75.
 14. The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the compression A isnot less than 20 and not greater than
 120. 15. The golf ball accordingto claim 1, wherein a ratio of a sum of areas of all the dimplesrelative to a surface area of a phantom sphere of the golf ball is notless than 78%.
 16. The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein a totalnumber of the dimples is not less than 250 and not greater than
 450. 17.The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein a total volume D of thedimples is not less than 200 mm³ and not greater than 500 mm³.